Discussion Post
Discussion Post
***I would like to write about how I observed how a nurse leader implemented change in an organization with applying the 4D framework of appreciative inquiry (AI) and an example***
Identify – from your perspective, the greatest advantage of using appreciative inquiry (AI) to implement change. Provide an exemplar.
Discuss an organizational change in which you have been involved or have observed.
Apply the 4 D framework of AI.:
- Discovery Phase,
- Dreaming Phase,
- Designing Phase and
- Delivery Phase.
Instructions
Initial post: Reflection, application with exemplar and 2- 3 resources.
Instructions
Initial post: Reflection, application with exemplar and resources.
DB Rubric | ||
DB Rubric | ||
Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
Initial Post – Quality of Content and Support from the Literature – 30 Points
view longer description |
30 to >19 pts
Proficient Initial posting provides answers to all questions posed in the DB. The response is thoughtful and well organized, grounded in the literature, inclusive of two or more references. One reference in addition to texts must be included as a reference. 19 to >10 pts Competent Posting reflects response to DB Question partially and/or could be improved in regard to presentation, organization and appropriate referencing. 10 to >0 pts Novice Posting does not meet expectations for quality and/or resources missing. |
Points/ 30 pts
Add Additional Comments |
Personal and Professional Insight – 30 Points
view longer description |
30 to >19 pts
Proficient Contributes unique perspectives or insights from personal experience or examples from health care field demonstrating applied course knowledge. Exemplar required. 19 to >10 pts Competent Postings and responses provide personal perspectives and a minimum application of course knowledge. 10 to >0 pts Novice Posts and responses do not reflect personal perspectives or application of course knowledge. |
Points/ 30 pts
Add Additional Comments |
Peer Response and Interaction – 30 Points
view longer description |
30 to >19 pts
Proficient Provides responses on time meeting or exceeding required number of responses requested. Actively stimulates discussion. Includes support from the literature – minimum of one reference per each required response as identified in instructions. 19 to >10 pts Competent Meets expectations providing initial and subsequent postings on time with required number of references. Does not stimulate discussion or offer information supportive of new knowledge for peers. 10 to >0 pts Novice Fails to meet requirements of posting and literature requirements, or reacts defensively to peer responses. |
Points/ 30 pts
Add Additional Comments |
APA, Syntax, Spelling & Organization – 10 Points
view longer description |
10 to >7 pts
Proficient APA, grammar, spelling, punctuation, rare errors. Use headings where applicable. Maximum word count 500. 7 to >4 pts Competent APA, grammar, spelling, punctuation contain a few errors. 4 to >0 pts Proficient APA, grammar, spelling, punctuation contain multiple errors. |
Points/ 10 pts
Add Additional Comments |
Total Points: 0 out of 100 |
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE !!
Solution
Appreciation Inquiry
Using the appreciative inquiry (AI) process in the decision-making and change implementation process is very important in an organization. Most organizations especially hospitals have adopted the 4D appreciative initiative in improving the care processes. According to Oliver (2017), the use of the appreciative inquiry process in decision making and change implementation process helps create and implement a common goal in an organization and solve discourses. This paper is a reflection on the application of the AI process in my workplace.
In the hospital, there was an increase in hospital-associated infections in the intensive care unit and thus the chief nursing officer was concerned about the rates and started the process of improving the hospital-associated infection rates. The chief nursing officer called for a collaborative inquiry on the issue. All nurses in the critical and surgical care units were called in a meeting in discussing about the increasing rates of hospital associated infections. The collaborative meeting entailed looking for the available resources and processes that would help positively impacting on the hospital-associated infections in the hospital. In the meeting, every nurse was given an opportunity to positively discuss about the capability of the hospital in handling the issue, considering the available resources. This is the discovery stage of the AI process. For example, in this stage, the stakeholders established that many nurses could help in training and educating the new entry nurses on how to improve the quality and safety of care to the patients. The nurses also established that the organization has enough water and sanitization resources that are essential in improving care hygiene and HAI rates (Roshana et al., 2020).
The nurse leader led the group in envisioning the future standards of care for the ICU unit and other critical care units in the hospital. For improved provision of quality and safe care especially in the intensive care units, the nurses predicted that the organization was in a position to effectively support and uplift the prospective strategies to improving the HAI rates. The consultative gathering of stakeholders established that the clear possibilities towards the issue were that the organization could improve HAIs by 60% with the available resources. Some of the things considered were the readiness for change, availability of funds for providing key materials for hygiene management and for supporting training programs of the units’ healthcare providers. Some of the programs that lacked probability of success was high level of supervision due to lack of enough nurse leaders in the unit to provide scheduled supervision and reviews for quality nursing practices.
The design stage involved coming up with effective strategies for reducing the HAI rates. The nurses for instance verified the possibilities of having monthly training on HAIs and implementation of the nursing care standards such as hand sanitization as key processes of improving the HAIs. The nurses led by the CNO established that the training programs and sanitization resources were available and would be effectively implemented. The stakeholders asked for continuous support from the administration in supplying the sanitization materials and maintaining regular evaluations on adherence to the set standards of operation in improving the quality of patient care. According to the resolution, the programs were to be continuously implemented and evaluated for continuous improvement of the patient care safety and quality. All nurses in the units were required to regularly attend the patient safety improvement workshops which are usually quarterly. Provision of key hygiene materials such as gloves, sanitizers and handwashing materials among other hygiene supplements would be availed by the hospital all through.
References
Oliver, C. (2017). Critical appreciative inquiry as an intervention in organizational discourse. Organisational Development in Healthcare, 205-218.
Roshan, R., Feroz, A. S., Rafique, Z., & Virani, N. (2020). Rigorous hand hygiene practices among health care workers reduce hospital-associated infections during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of primary care & community health, 11, 2150132720943331.
