Discussion Question -PHN-600-Topic 5 DQ 2
Discussion Question -PHN-600-Topic 5 DQ 2
Discussion Question -PHN-600-Topic 5 DQ 2
Several models support the practice of health promotion and disease prevention. Discuss one model that you can use in the public health setting and provide an example specific to your current situation. Consider what aspects the model incorporates from the Minnesota Department of Health’s public health intervention wheel in your response.
Please see the below information that may be helpful regarding the specific example connected to my current situation –
I currently work as a public health nurse on a COVID-19 Task Force in Fairfax, Virginia, or you can use my former role working as a public health nurse in Fairfax, Virginia, in the schools as a school nurse.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE !!
Solution
Discussion Question -PHN-600-Topic 5 DQ 2
The social-ecological model can be utilized in public health settings in health promotion and disease prevention. Therefore, the social-ecological model highlights the interdependence and interaction of various factors across and within all levels of a specific health problem (Wold & Mittelmark, 2018). The social-ecological model also highlights the interaction of individuals with their socio-cultural and physical environment. The social-ecological model recognizes different levels of influence on health behaviors, including interpersonal factors, individual factors, organization of factors, community factors, and public policy factors (Wold & Mittelmark, 2018). The individual factors that will influence health behaviors include beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and personality.
On the other hand, the interpersonal factors that influence health behaviors include interactions with other people that can create barriers or provide social support towards healthy behaviors (Wold & Mittelmark, 2018). An organization’s rules and regulations can promote or hinder healthy behaviors. Community factors can also enhance or limit healthy behaviors, including formal and informal social norms among groups, individuals, or organizations. Policy factors, including federal, state, or local policies and loss, can also support or regulate healthy behaviors and disease prevention practices factors (Wold & Mittelmark, 2018).
In my current role as a public health nurse working in a covid-19 task force in Fairfax, Virginia, the social-ecological model can be used in health promotion and disease prevention. Therefore, the social-ecological model can help to understand individual factors that affect the adherence of individuals to social distancing and mask-wearing protocols to limit the spread of covid-19. Utilizing the social-ecological model, interpersonal, organizational, and communal factors that affect the adherence of individuals to social distancing and mask-wearing protocols to prevent the spread of COVID-19 can also be evaluated. Finally, utilizing the ecological model, public policy factors such as federal, state, and local laws can be enacted to prevent the spread of COVID-19, such as mask mandates and social distancing guidelines.
The ecological model incorporates different aspects from the Minnesota Department of Health public health intervention wheel, with individual interpersonal, organizational, and communal factors being covered by individual-focused health promotion activities such as surveillance outreach screening, case management, health teaching, counseling, and consultation (Minnesota Department of Health, 2019). On the other hand, the public policy factors in the ecological model are covered in the policy development and enforcement elements of the Minnesota Department of Health public health intervention wheel.
References
Minnesota Department of Health. (2019). Public health interventions: Applications for public
health nursing practice (2nd ed.).
Wold, B., & Mittelmark, M. B. (2018). Health-promotion research over three decades: The
social-ecological model and challenges in implementation of interventions. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 46(20_suppl), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494817743893
