Remote collaboration and evidence-based care

Remote collaboration and evidence-based care

This essay is to be used as a video talk. The topic should be from Vila Health provided. Essay to be written out and references to include Vila Health and all formated in APA form.

Place your order today!

Solution to Remote collaboration and evidence based care

Introduction

The case scenario presented indicates the instance where health professionals engage in situations that require collaboration in various healthcare settings particularly the planning and providing patient care. The case is about remote collaboration to attend to Caitlynn, a two-year-old child who has been admitted twice in the past six months. In the scenario, healthcare providers have agreed to undertake more diagnostic examinations to confirm the underlying cause of her medical issue. The test conducted on her electrolyte levels indicates that she has cystic fibrosis. The team concluded to perform collaborative remedial interventions to best assist the client to improve the client’s condition and save her life. The team used Skype to facilitate effective communication amongst individuals from different geographical locations. Thus, the video provides a critical reflection concerning evidence-based practice remotely to a patient in Valley City and improvement of Villa Health patient safety and outcome in providing remote services. Also, it offers a proposal of an evidence-based care plan and examination of the benefits and strategies to mitigate challenges interdisciplinary collaboration to plan care within the context of a remote team.

Evidence-Based Care Plan and Patient Safety

Appropriate diagnosis is important to improve patient safety and patient outcomes as demonstrated by the Villa Health remote collaboration scenario. It is important to confirm the correct diagnosis a patient is suffering from before commencing treatment as demonstrated by Dr. Copeland and the team of health professionals who confirmed the care to be accorded to the patient in a consultative manner. In the case scenario, providers including physicians, respiratory therapists, and nurses to consider interventions that were evidence-based in care provision. Although there is no specific treatment for cystic fibrosis, the healthcare team considered interventions that were helpful to the patient in the management of pain and other associated complications. Thus, the most essential evidence-based care plan is individualized care that is focused on the improvement of patient safety (Myers et al., 2018). Also, evidence-based practice care remotely should consider service accessibility and affordability by the patient. In the scenario, the providers discussed the cost of services and engaged the client to confirm if they can afford the care.

Evidence-Based Care Plan and Patient Safety

The evidence-based practice model that can be adopted in the context of the Villa Health scenario is Johns Hopkins, the evidence-based practice model. The healthcare providers in the case scenario used the Johns Hopkins model is away since they incorporated the three-step process to meet the needs of Caitlynn including problem identification, choice of the appropriate evidence for case management, and the translation of EBP into patient care. John Hopkin’s model utilizes tools that incorporate the latest literature review to use recent findings that are evidence-based to manage a wide array of conditions (McNett et., 2018). Also, it offers a collaborative approach to permit various healthcare providers to work collectively to improve patient outcomes and safety. For example, the providers adopted a collaborative approach in the scenario when the social worker, nurse, and respiratory therapist made follow-ups to Caitlynn’s family.

The Most Relevant and Useful Evidence in Making Care Plan Decision

The is no specific cure for cystic fibrosis, the treatment approaches for Caitlynn are tailored to different intervention goals in a supportive nature. The most relevant or useful evidence in making her care decision is to prioritize the prevention of lung infection, protecting the GIT from intestinal blockage, providing adequate nutrition, and enhancing respiratory clearance through the removal of mucus. In the scenario, the providers decided to administer intravenous Piperacillin and aerosol treatment to manage bacterial infections and remove secretions respectively. In the management of intestinal blockage, the primary clinician-administered oral pancreatic enzymes to enhance digestion as the treatment approach enables the digestive system during the absorption of nutrients (Katkade, Sanders & Zou, 2018). Additionally, the providers advised the client to consume diets that are high in calories, proteins, and vitamins to improve the patients’ nutritional status. The other useful or relevant evidence used while making the care plan decision is the recommendation of chest therapy and nebulized aerosols by the respiratory therapist since the patient is incapable of performing huff breaths to manage lung secretions.

Benefits and Strategies to Mitigate the Challenges of Interdisciplinary Collaboration

The challenges of providing remote healthcare services to patients who have limited access to healthcare services are overwhelming hence interdisciplinary collaboration is essential since it enhances the quality of providing home-based care. In the villa health scenario, the providers were working from various locations to attend to patient populations. The strategy used in the scenario to mitigate the challenges of remote collaboration is the incorporation of video conferencing via Skype in consultation services to offer suitable medical interventions (Freeth & Caniglia, 2020). The use of video conferencing was an essential method for healthcare providers to exchange ideas and share knowledge suitable in the provision of evidence-based care. Moreover, teamwork strategies such as open communication and shared decision-making were essential to offer a solution to the challenges experienced during the remote collaboration.

Conclusion

In summary, the interaction of healthcare providers in the facility and within partner facilities in adopting the best interventions to remedy Caitlynn’s situation is a perfect example of effective remote collaboration. The collaborative care plan should consider providers’ experience and expertise to effectively manage the condition hence enhancing patient safety. The most relevant evidence was used in making her care decision is to prioritize the prevention of lung infection, protecting the GIT from intestinal blockage, providing adequate nutrition, and enhancing respiratory clearance through the removal of mucus. Also, the consultative approach adopted was important in the provision of respectful care while holistically considering the needs of Caitlynn and the family’s capability.

References

Freeth, R., & Caniglia, G. (2020). Learning to collaborate while collaborating: Advancing interdisciplinary sustainability research. Sustainability Science, 15(1), 247-261.

Katkade, V. B., Sanders, K. N., & Zou, K. H. (2018). Real-world data: an opportunity to supplement existing evidence for the use of long-established medicines in health care decision making. Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 11, 295.

Myers, J., Cosby, R., Gzik, D., Harle, I., Harrold, D., Incardona, N., & Walton, T. (2018). Provider tools for advance care planning and goals of care discussions: a systematic review. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®, 35(8), 1123-1132.

McNett, M., Tucker, S., Thomas, B., Gorsuch, P., & Gallagher-Ford, L. (2021). Use of Implementation Science to Advance Nurse-Led Evidence-Based Practices in Clinical Settings. Nurse Leader.