The Future of Printed Books Argument Paper

The Future of Printed Books

The cause of the argument concerned the future of printed books. After searching for some books in the school library without success, my friend Joan and I started walking out. We never found two of the three books we wanted, and soon after coming out of the library, I observed that the printed books were becoming an inconvenience and would undoubtedly come to an end. Joan would not buy this idea, and she supported her opinion by citing that I hurriedly searched for the books and that I never found one. She added that I did not even know how to use the library catalogue The Future of Printed Books Argument Paper.Her observations caused an argument, and a resolution was to be made to stop the argument.

The primary cause of this argument was the failure to listen to each other. For instance, at some point, Joan yelled at me, telling me that I never knew how to use the library (Collins, p. 8). This brought me to another level, and I started thinking about how to support my point. I hardly listened or took time to categorically explain to her what I meant in the first place. I told her that she was living in the 20th century, when paperback books were valued. I pressed that electronic sources were the best and most available for learning and that only a matter of years, the books cease to exist. This became a bitter cause of exchange as Joan was determined to bring me down and show me that I knew little about what I was speaking about. The aspect of criticism of one another’s observations made it worse, and the use of hand gestures and strange facial expressions was coming into force (Botting, p. 3) The Future of Printed Books Argument Paper.

Defensive behavior is another reason this argument broke out. It was apparent that we were both proud, and no one was ready to give in. For instance, Joan was not comfortable when I told her that the books were quickly replaced by electronic sources and would become extinct (Botting, p. 3). This defensive response triggered Joan to argue even more vehemently and raising her voice. At this point, the argument became messy and attracted the audience, making it even more heated. Emotional issues in the argument were a significant cause of the argument as we were all not ready to lose before our friends. The fact that friends were now gathering was making every side have supported and who only made the issue more pronounced (Collins, p. 8).

What started as a simple conversation became a loud and public affair, and I had to change the direction. All over sudden, I began accrediting Joan’s point of view by informing her that ‘I understand’ (Wertheim, p. 5). This made her start toning down and laughed at me that I had been defeated. Joan was not relenting and believed that I was getting unsound facts about the arguments, and she stated that books were like the foundation of a house through which every other electronic material is produced The Future of Printed Books Argument Paper. She says that there will be no end to reading research and written work. I supported her and added that the books were an all-time resource that is indispensable in education. I reiterated her point that books were a great way to make online and electronic materials (Scannel, p. 3).

In addition, I had to compromise my beliefs and ideas to resolve the argument. I began coming up with neutral sentiments like "you are right," which saw Joan become more relieved and calmer. She started supporting my side at some level (Scannel, p. 3). I remember bringing conservation issues by informing her that the millions of trees were being felled to produce books. In addition, I stated that books were hectic to read as opposed to electronic sources that motivated research and reading. She also agreed with me on this point, but insisted that these were not enough reasons for the books’ end. In a different move, she started responding to my view with phrases such as ‘I understand,’ which showed that we were getting along well. It became apparent that in order to bring the argument to an end, I had to deflate my ego and show more restraint towards my words. With friends cheering on every point raised, it was headed in the wrong way, which would cause a fight and abusive language (Wertheim, p. 6). The Future of Printed Books Argument Paper.

The causes of the arguments were simple elements of pride and poor listening among us. It was evident that we never trusted each other’s point of view, which is why we engaged in it. Also, the use of pricking and defaming words made it worse. However, realizing that things were getting out of hand, I swiftly changed tone and began compromising on my side and developing a kind of empathy towards Joan’s ideas. This was effective in making her see that I now understood her point, and this brought about more sound and calm conversation.

Works Cited

Wertheim. E. Negotiations and Resolving Conflicts: An Overview, North-eastern University, 2019.

Scannel. M. The Big Book of Conflict-Resolution Games. 2010.

Collins. P. Hahn. U. Arguments and Their Sources, The Psychology of Argument: Cognitive Approaches to Argumentation and Persuasion (Vol. 59), 2016.

Boating. D. Reasons Why Arguments and Explanations Are Different, 2014. The Future of Printed Books Argument Paper.